Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post your work in progress of your aircraft builds in here.
User avatar
BlackSheep214
Elite Member
Posts: 13419
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:47 pm

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by BlackSheep214 »

She's a pretty filly! I'm glad you were able to finish in her glory! Well done! :shoutout: :shoutout: :shoutout:
“Who controls the skies, controls the fate of this Earth”

Author unknown- 352nd Fighter Group, Blue-Nosed Bastards of Bodney

“Send one plane it’s a sortie; send two planes it’s a flight; send four planes it’s a test of airpower. - Richard Kohn
User avatar
Stikpusher
Moderator
Posts: 21189
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:37 pm
Location: Ceti Alpha 5

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by Stikpusher »

Beautiful finish! Have no luck is now shiny and beautiful!

I don't know which is the more attractive aircraft of the 51 or 262, both are lovely designs.... but if a shark could fly, it would be a 262.
"Surely I have made my meaning plain? I intend to avenge myself upon you, Admiral. I have deprived your ship of power, and when I swing 'round, I intend to deprive you of your life."

FLSM
User avatar
Bolleken
Master Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:42 am
Location: Wuppertal - Home of the "Schwebebahn"

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by Bolleken »

Thanks guys. I really appriciate your comments.
But show must go on. The primed and preshaded Me might let u imagine, what the camouflage will be....
Image
User avatar
speedgraflex
Moderator
Posts: 11358
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by speedgraflex »

Stikpusher wrote:Beautiful finish! Have no luck is now shiny and beautiful!

I don't know which is the more attractive aircraft of the 51 or 262, both are lovely designs.... but if a shark could fly, it would be a 262.
:Shark:

Congratulations, Marius—good luck with your "Schwalbe!"

EDIT

Marius, I meant to also point out that the new clean white background for photography is beautiful. I expect the choice may be motivated by the finish of the aircraft, but I approve of the white background! The focus is clearly upon the object being seen without distraction.
Last edited by speedgraflex on Mon Jul 10, 2017 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Make more models!
User avatar
Bolleken
Master Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:42 am
Location: Wuppertal - Home of the "Schwebebahn"

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by Bolleken »

speedgraflex wrote:RED X

Image

One day soon I will conquer camouflage!

BLITZBOMBER

Image

A favorite.

On Red X, the fuselage looks very light gray based upon the artist's rendering. The only search of note I turned up were documents from the RAF Museum indicating that the museum painted a captured bird as "Red X" at one point. I will add a link to the documents, if you are curious!

https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/ ... 112372.pdf

Is the Matchbox model from the time when Revell took over? The decal sheet for Matchbox Red X has Revell's name on it.... I am afraid I know very little of Matchbox history. Would you know the context of the inclusion of Revell's name? Is this simply one company taking over another?


P-51

Thank you for the explanation! The oven cleaner effectively cleaned these panel lines, for sure! Wow!
Hi Bruce.
The Matchbox Me 262 is one of their first own molds from the beginning of the 70s. My release is from the 90s when Revell oG took over.
Maybe this is a reason why parts had poor fitting and why the canopy looked that terrible.
The red X seems to be assembled by different parts because the provided production number is not in Messerschmitt's production lists. That makes it easy to do an owncamouflage.
User avatar
speedgraflex
Moderator
Posts: 11358
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by speedgraflex »

THANKS!

Have you considered doing the diagonal stripe versions—Plates 2 and 3—on this chart?

Image

Such a beautiful design!!!!

Image
Last edited by speedgraflex on Mon Jul 10, 2017 12:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
Make more models!
User avatar
Bolleken
Master Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:42 am
Location: Wuppertal - Home of the "Schwebebahn"

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by Bolleken »

Nö because I haven't known about it. But looks great. Maybe an opportunity for the upcoming Airfix...
User avatar
speedgraflex
Moderator
Posts: 11358
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by speedgraflex »

Even the tail is striped! Hm, hm, hm. What is the plan for your current Schwalbe? Hellbau fuselage, lower wings, than splinter upper wings? I know you wrote specifically what your intentions are, more of a freestyle interpretation due to the mysterious origin of Red X. Are you going to keep the fueslage in mostly hellblau, Marius?
Make more models!
User avatar
Bolleken
Master Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:42 am
Location: Wuppertal - Home of the "Schwebebahn"

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by Bolleken »

My Schwalbe will have a NMF tail starting behind canopy, lower surfaces RLM76, wings upper splinter RLM 81/82, camouflage on fuselage RLM 76, upper areas RLM 74/75 plus RLM 02 mottling and RLM 74/75 dots.
Might be interesting
User avatar
speedgraflex
Moderator
Posts: 11358
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff

Post by speedgraflex »

Bolleken wrote:My Schwalbe will have a NMF tail starting behind canopy, lower surfaces RLM76, wings upper splinter RLM 81/82, camouflage on fuselage RLM 76, upper areas RLM 74/75 plus RLM 02 mottling and RLM 74/75 dots.
Might be interesting
VERY COOL IDEA!

This might be useful for the bare metal finish from behind the cockpit to the tail section.

Image
Make more models!
Post Reply

Return to “Aircraft Work in Progress”