Page 24 of 121
Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:04 am
by BlackSheep214
Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 4:20 pm
by Stikpusher
Beautiful finish! Have no luck is now shiny and beautiful!
I don't know which is the more attractive aircraft of the 51 or 262, both are lovely designs.... but if a shark could fly, it would be a 262.
Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:03 pm
by Bolleken
Thanks guys. I really appriciate your comments.
But show must go on. The primed and preshaded Me might let u imagine, what the camouflage will be....

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:33 pm
by speedgraflex
Stikpusher wrote:Beautiful finish! Have no luck is now shiny and beautiful!
I don't know which is the more attractive aircraft of the 51 or 262, both are lovely designs.... but if a shark could fly, it would be a 262.
Congratulations, Marius—good luck with your "Schwalbe!"
EDIT
Marius, I meant to also point out that the new clean white background for photography is beautiful. I expect the choice may be motivated by the finish of the aircraft, but I approve of the white background! The focus is clearly upon the object being seen without distraction.
Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 11:57 pm
by Bolleken
speedgraflex wrote:RED X
One day soon I will conquer camouflage!
BLITZBOMBER
A favorite.
On Red X, the fuselage looks very light gray based upon the artist's rendering. The only search of note I turned up were documents from the RAF Museum indicating that the museum painted a captured bird as "Red X" at one point. I will add a link to the documents, if you are curious!
https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/ ... 112372.pdf
Is the Matchbox model from the time when Revell took over? The decal sheet for Matchbox Red X has Revell's name on it.... I am afraid I know very little of Matchbox history. Would you know the context of the inclusion of Revell's name? Is this simply one company taking over another?
P-51
Thank you for the explanation! The oven cleaner effectively cleaned these panel lines, for sure! Wow!
Hi Bruce.
The Matchbox Me 262 is one of their first own molds from the beginning of the 70s. My release is from the 90s when Revell oG took over.
Maybe this is a reason why parts had poor fitting and why the canopy looked that terrible.
The red X seems to be assembled by different parts because the provided production number is not in Messerschmitt's production lists. That makes it easy to do an owncamouflage.
Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 12:08 am
by speedgraflex
THANKS!
Have you considered doing the diagonal stripe versions—Plates 2 and 3—on this chart?
Such a beautiful design!!!!

Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 12:21 am
by Bolleken
Nö because I haven't known about it. But looks great. Maybe an opportunity for the upcoming Airfix...
Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 12:30 am
by speedgraflex
Even the tail is striped! Hm, hm, hm. What is the plan for your current Schwalbe? Hellbau fuselage, lower wings, than splinter upper wings? I know you wrote specifically what your intentions are, more of a freestyle interpretation due to the mysterious origin of Red X. Are you going to keep the fueslage in mostly hellblau, Marius?
Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 12:43 am
by Bolleken
My Schwalbe will have a NMF tail starting behind canopy, lower surfaces RLM76, wings upper splinter RLM 81/82, camouflage on fuselage RLM 76, upper areas RLM 74/75 plus RLM 02 mottling and RLM 74/75 dots.
Might be interesting
Re: Bolleken's 1:72 stuff
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 12:57 am
by speedgraflex
Bolleken wrote:My Schwalbe will have a NMF tail starting behind canopy, lower surfaces RLM76, wings upper splinter RLM 81/82, camouflage on fuselage RLM 76, upper areas RLM 74/75 plus RLM 02 mottling and RLM 74/75 dots.
Might be interesting
VERY COOL IDEA!
This might be useful for the bare metal finish from behind the cockpit to the tail section.
