mustang1989 wrote:Man that work on the engine is really payin' off Kenny. Kudos goes out to you on the wire harness. I look at it like this.....if we're going to take the time to open something up then go all out and wide open throttle with it. I also believe that when we open something up like this to show it off it becomes the "showcase" of the model. Like "look in here" type stuff. When something is a show case....well......give 'em a show.

Mustang Joe, I could not agree more.
The cowling on this kit, and those side panels, are meant to be removable. And at first I was inclined to just build it out and entomb everything in there, but Tamiya did such a good job on the engine and stuff, and it’ll look great in there with the Aotake color as a backdrop, contrasting the main color, I rethought that decision especially considering I have the PE set that Eduard made to pick up what little slack Tamiya left, detail-wise. I want to be able to show this all buttoned up and then pop the cowling and panel off and say “And hey! Look in here!” It’ll be worth all the extra effort, definitely!
jkim wrote:Love the work, Kenny. From the tonal depth that your basing technique gives to you mono scheme to the decision to paint your fabric surfaces in a different color... your choices and execution have been wonderful. I love the look of the Zero with the legs mounted but engine absent... reminds me of a factory scene. Only a couple of observational comments. The landing gear and wheels look a touch too new and pristine? I know weathering is yet to come and I may be premature with that comment but I thought I'd throw it up. That just caught my eye, compared to the weathered look that your basing technique gives to the airframe. The other comment may also be baseless. It looks like the tonal variation is almost non-existent on the bottom compared to the top. Is it just the photos or something that you purposefully did?
I'm really digging your work Kenny! One of the projects that is sparking my desire to come back and work on my builds again.
John, those are both solid observations.
In terms of the landing gear- they haven’t undergone any weathering yet. While this carrier-based aircraft was new at the time before the raid, I’d imagine it would’ve been flown several times pre-raid and that even being carrier-based, the gear and struts wold get brake dust on them, maybe even some hydraulic and brake fluid here and there, and so forth. So when the time comes for what little weathering I plan to do comes around, I’ll be adding some of that.
As to the underside, that’s probably the light and the fact that the surface isn’t curved. Here’s a better shot:
The tonal variation is on par with the top, to my taste at least, with one exception- I did not go as far in terms of lightening hues inside the panels as I did on the top, and that was absolutely intentional and in-line with my vision for this project. In my mind, topside sees more sun on a carrier deck than the bottom, same when in the air. When I was envisioning this project, I imagined an allied pilot seeing one for the first time. The aircraft banks, the hue shifts, and the sun illuminates certain panels and sections more than the others, and that illumination shifts to other panels in an almost other-worldly way, as the aircraft moved through the air, and banks more steeply. I should probably mention that my vision for this on no way reflects reality or any kind of verisimilitude or whatever. While I did correspond with Straggler so that I could get a good, solid color match for the airframe and fabric-covered control surfaces, as well as the “Modeling The A62M Zero” book, the vision that developed in my mind was more akin to what you would’ve seen if there were early Zeros in Ghost In The Shell, or Akira. In other words, my vision is half what may have actually been in reality and half what you might see in anime. I’m waking that line that separates the two and trying to blur it a little bit. I guess because at the moment I’m fixated on aircraft that seem otherworldly to me, so to me, there should be something otherworldly to it, like the hue shifts, and that at certain angles there is more or less hue shifts and variation, along with the surface detail being subtly called out in that “noticed but not seen” way. LOL Anyhow, it’s really just me, a dude with a vivid imagination, trying to represent what’s in my head when I envision this aircraft, as opposed to strict reality, while using techniques that represent what could happen in reality as best I can, and trying as hard as I can to not make it look like a die-cast toy. That’s my style. That’s what I’m developing.
Thank you both for your comments and kind encouragement. It is much appreciated. Sincerely :-)