Re: Just had a really good laugh.
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:53 am
Jim, that WIP that you read is one of the real definitions of "AMS", the other discussion might just be "Rivet Counting"
AMS, or Advanced Modeling Syndrome, is being "so advanced" as a modeler that nothing gets finished (and has been defined by some people as "so skilled that he can not get started")
Rivet Counting is supposed to be the Rude practice of pointing out other people's mistakes on a forum or in public.
Seeking Accuracy in a person's own builds, and actually building things is neither Rivet Counting or AMS, though. EAB might be one way to define those builders, as in Extremely Accurate Building.
So, when I build using the "best" kit I can find, with aftermarket weapons to get the "correct" shape, and add a resin cockpit and photo etched Remove Before Flight tags on an aircraft model with my paints all matched to FS standards according to the Monogram USN Color Guide,,,,,,that is neither AMS or Rivet Counting, it is just "building an accurate model",,,,,,a practice that goes back into the early/mid sixties with the advent of Profile Publications and Arco-Aircam booklets.
As for not finishing a build,,,,I know a modeler that enjoys cockpits a lot, and always gets stuck when it comes time to capture all the parts between the fuselage halves. So, he has a ton of cockpits that he has finished, but, rarely finishes a full model. He has fun doing the parts he does do, though.
I do absolutely agree with that part about each of us not telling anyone else how he or she should enjoy their hobby, though. I don't even believe we *have* to stick to one modeling style with each of our own builds, either, if we don't want to. Accurately build one model, get the next one straight OOB, Super Detail another, and then do what Steve M calls "Snake slapping it together" on the next model,,,,,,,it is all up to us, we shouldn't feel defensive in the least about which way we choose.
AMS, or Advanced Modeling Syndrome, is being "so advanced" as a modeler that nothing gets finished (and has been defined by some people as "so skilled that he can not get started")
Rivet Counting is supposed to be the Rude practice of pointing out other people's mistakes on a forum or in public.
Seeking Accuracy in a person's own builds, and actually building things is neither Rivet Counting or AMS, though. EAB might be one way to define those builders, as in Extremely Accurate Building.
So, when I build using the "best" kit I can find, with aftermarket weapons to get the "correct" shape, and add a resin cockpit and photo etched Remove Before Flight tags on an aircraft model with my paints all matched to FS standards according to the Monogram USN Color Guide,,,,,,that is neither AMS or Rivet Counting, it is just "building an accurate model",,,,,,a practice that goes back into the early/mid sixties with the advent of Profile Publications and Arco-Aircam booklets.
As for not finishing a build,,,,I know a modeler that enjoys cockpits a lot, and always gets stuck when it comes time to capture all the parts between the fuselage halves. So, he has a ton of cockpits that he has finished, but, rarely finishes a full model. He has fun doing the parts he does do, though.
I do absolutely agree with that part about each of us not telling anyone else how he or she should enjoy their hobby, though. I don't even believe we *have* to stick to one modeling style with each of our own builds, either, if we don't want to. Accurately build one model, get the next one straight OOB, Super Detail another, and then do what Steve M calls "Snake slapping it together" on the next model,,,,,,,it is all up to us, we shouldn't feel defensive in the least about which way we choose.