Re: 1/32 Revell Bf109G-10 Hartmann
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:47 pm
This is a little side trip for those of you that wanted to see a comparison between the Henri Daehne prop and the AMUR Reaver prop. But firsl, I wanted to share this pic...

No, this is not a future vintage build! Consider it a photographic expression of how much I hate those end-opening boxes that Revell insists on packing its nice kits in. I can't stand those things so I am using this empty box to house the Revell sprues for the duration of this build.
Let's have a look at three Bf109 spinners. The shiny one is by HD. The cream colored spinner is AMUR Reaver's. The remaining one is the Revell spinner. More alike than different, they all feature the correct teardrop shape of the blade openings. The HD and Reaver spinner go one up on the Revell offering by presenting some very fine rivet detail. The Revell version is knocked down even further by a strange decision to cut the spinner in half. By Revell's reckoning, the modeler is supposed to glue the blades into the lower half of the spinner and then glue the top half on. Makes no sense... leaves a very awkward seam line that is difficult to fix due to the blades getting in the way. And how are you supposed to put a spiral on the spinner with the blades in place?

Looking at the spinner alone, I would call the HD and Reaver even steven. However, HD goes that extra step and presents a complete prop hub and cannon barrel assembly. Granted that much of this detail is lost with the spinner mounted, it is nevertheless nice to look at before it gets covered up. HD also provides a spinner backplate with detail molded onto its face.

Profiles of the three spinners looks to be very similar. The Revell and Reaver spinners follow a very similar curvature. The HD prop has little bit less curvature than the other two.

Note the different sizes of the holes in the spinners. The larger hole on the HD spinner can be explained by the separate cannon barrel that is provided. The Revell and Reaver spinners have the cannon barrel molded as part of the spinner. I may modify the Reaver spinner and add a piece of hollow brass for the cannon barrel.

The prop blades have some interesting differences. The HD blade has the bluntest tip and has a generally parallel outline. The Reaver blade has a noticeably wider waist, giving the blade a slight pear-like profile. The Revell blade shape sits between the two, sharing Reaver's pointier tip but not as wide a waist.

Looking at the trailing edges of the blades, HD's is razor sharp. Surprisingly, the Reaver's trailing edge is on the fat side and is in need of a sharpening, which should be easily accomplished with a few whisks on the sanding block. The edge of the Revell blade commendably thin, almost as sharp as the HD blade. In terms of overall thickness, the Revell blade is the thinnest. Too thin I would say. It gives the blade a weird twisty look from certain angles.

Another view of the blades, comparing their outlines.

Once again, I have no judgements to offer regarding the accuracy of these spinners and prop blades. Just a comparison for comparison's sake.

No, this is not a future vintage build! Consider it a photographic expression of how much I hate those end-opening boxes that Revell insists on packing its nice kits in. I can't stand those things so I am using this empty box to house the Revell sprues for the duration of this build.
Let's have a look at three Bf109 spinners. The shiny one is by HD. The cream colored spinner is AMUR Reaver's. The remaining one is the Revell spinner. More alike than different, they all feature the correct teardrop shape of the blade openings. The HD and Reaver spinner go one up on the Revell offering by presenting some very fine rivet detail. The Revell version is knocked down even further by a strange decision to cut the spinner in half. By Revell's reckoning, the modeler is supposed to glue the blades into the lower half of the spinner and then glue the top half on. Makes no sense... leaves a very awkward seam line that is difficult to fix due to the blades getting in the way. And how are you supposed to put a spiral on the spinner with the blades in place?

Looking at the spinner alone, I would call the HD and Reaver even steven. However, HD goes that extra step and presents a complete prop hub and cannon barrel assembly. Granted that much of this detail is lost with the spinner mounted, it is nevertheless nice to look at before it gets covered up. HD also provides a spinner backplate with detail molded onto its face.

Profiles of the three spinners looks to be very similar. The Revell and Reaver spinners follow a very similar curvature. The HD prop has little bit less curvature than the other two.

Note the different sizes of the holes in the spinners. The larger hole on the HD spinner can be explained by the separate cannon barrel that is provided. The Revell and Reaver spinners have the cannon barrel molded as part of the spinner. I may modify the Reaver spinner and add a piece of hollow brass for the cannon barrel.

The prop blades have some interesting differences. The HD blade has the bluntest tip and has a generally parallel outline. The Reaver blade has a noticeably wider waist, giving the blade a slight pear-like profile. The Revell blade shape sits between the two, sharing Reaver's pointier tip but not as wide a waist.

Looking at the trailing edges of the blades, HD's is razor sharp. Surprisingly, the Reaver's trailing edge is on the fat side and is in need of a sharpening, which should be easily accomplished with a few whisks on the sanding block. The edge of the Revell blade commendably thin, almost as sharp as the HD blade. In terms of overall thickness, the Revell blade is the thinnest. Too thin I would say. It gives the blade a weird twisty look from certain angles.

Another view of the blades, comparing their outlines.

Once again, I have no judgements to offer regarding the accuracy of these spinners and prop blades. Just a comparison for comparison's sake.




































